<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media Relations Tip #5: Don’t ask to see it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediastyle.ca/2009/03/media-relations-tip-5-never-ask-to-see-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediastyle.ca/2009/03/media-relations-tip-5-never-ask-to-see-it/</link>
	<description>Progressive Communications &#38; Training</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:11:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Forrest</title>
		<link>http://www.mediastyle.ca/2009/03/media-relations-tip-5-never-ask-to-see-it/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Forrest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediastyle.ca/?p=666#comment-333</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been enjoying these tips, Ian. But I must respectfully disagree that you&#039;re never allowed to see a piece. Perhaps the &quot;rules&quot; are different with the swath of media we&#039;re generally dealing with - those focused exclusively on the B2B markets to which our clients speak. Rather often we are provided with a piece prior to its being printed, but not to review necessarily for marketing messages but rather for factual accuracy as we&#039;re usually dealing with very technology dense/technologically complex companies and products. In hard news or in consumer-based media coverage, I can see where your tip is more universally the case. 

I couldn&#039;t agree more with your third point above though, and this is a topic which we&#039;ve covered repeatedly on our blog, both with regards to clients - http://inmedialog.com/index.php/archives/the-interviews-never-over/ and how it pertains to us PR folks -  http://inmedialog.com/index.php/archives/revisiting-a-few-recent-posts/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been enjoying these tips, Ian. But I must respectfully disagree that you&#8217;re never allowed to see a piece. Perhaps the &#8220;rules&#8221; are different with the swath of media we&#8217;re generally dealing with &#8211; those focused exclusively on the B2B markets to which our clients speak. Rather often we are provided with a piece prior to its being printed, but not to review necessarily for marketing messages but rather for factual accuracy as we&#8217;re usually dealing with very technology dense/technologically complex companies and products. In hard news or in consumer-based media coverage, I can see where your tip is more universally the case. </p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more with your third point above though, and this is a topic which we&#8217;ve covered repeatedly on our blog, both with regards to clients &#8211; <a href="http://inmedialog.com/index.php/archives/the-interviews-never-over/" rel="nofollow">http://inmedialog.com/index.php/archives/the-interviews-never-over/</a> and how it pertains to us PR folks &#8211;  <a href="http://inmedialog.com/index.php/archives/revisiting-a-few-recent-posts/" rel="nofollow">http://inmedialog.com/index.php/archives/revisiting-a-few-recent-posts/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
